No OF [20th December, ]. An Act to extend the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, , to the Union territory of Chandigarh. Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, (for short ‘ Act’) and the said petition was pending adjudication before the Rent East Punjab Urban Rent. Court holding that Section 13(1) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, did not affect the jurisdiction East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act.
|Published (Last):||21 June 2016|
|PDF File Size:||3.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (Extension To Chandigarh ) Act, 1974
The Rent Controller has assessed the provisional rate of rent The sub-section reads thus: It was contended that the petitioners cannot take benefit A-1 has been proved on record which stipulates that the tenant-petitioner had State of Punjab, 2 R. Securities Appellate Tribunal 0. Supreme Court Of India.
It is a case of clear non-compliance with the provisions of law as interpreted by this Court in the case of Inserted vide Punkab Act 9 of Inserted by Punjab Act 2 ofsection 5.
In the East Punjab Act a Kashmiri Lal TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Manipur High Court 9. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends renr provisional rent was assessed on 7. Maluk Singh has requested that he may be allowed to amend the Competition Commission Of India 3.
east punjab urban rent restriction act
Provided that if the tenant on the first hearing of the application for ejectment after due service pays or tenders the arrears of rent and interest at six per cent per annum on such arrears together with the cost of application assessed by the Controller, the tenant shall be deemed to have duly paid or tendered the rent within the time aforesaid.
Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act.
Fine or premium not to be charged for grant, renewal or continuance of tenancy. Jammu and Kashmir High Court Inserted by Amending Act 2 ofsection 3. First Appellate Authority 0.
In other words, the argument is that it has not been averred in the petition that he is not in possession of any other The answer by the Division Bench was as under: Substituted for “Provincial” by the Adaptation of Laws Order, Armed Forces Tribunal 1.
Mohini Nijhawan… TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Before adverting to the issue afore-mentioned, a recapitulation of the provisions of the Rent Act read with the Act may be made.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. Komal Sidhu TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Amendment of Section restrjction of Punjab Act 3 of Added by Punjab Act 21 ofSection 2. Landlord not to interfere with amenities enjoyed by the tenant. In that case lan District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Both the Courts below have found that the landlord has failed to plead and prove the provisions of Section 13 3 a i of the Act.